After Action Review

Purpose

Reflection tool for recording and leveraging key initiative learnings

Who this is for

  • Project Leads
  • Team Members (use for learning, reflection, documentation)

When to use

  • Closing the initiative
  • Considering renewal or scaling
  • Researching and learning





Why is this toolkit important?

Projects produce learnings. Reflecting upon, recording, and then subsequently using those learnings creates a powerful source of institutional knowledge that new initiatives can use as a foundation.

Key actions

  • Practice having a review conversation at project 
end to reflect and record what was done and what 
was learned

  • Incorporate review of after-action learnings into initiation practices for new initiatives to leverage and benefit from continuity

How to use this toolkit

As the name suggests, most steps to use this tool are completed at the conclusion of the initiative – save for one. Once a practice of recording after-action reviews has become part of a team’s routine, one of the first steps in starting a new initiative is to review the learnings from similar past initiatives. These learnings are encapsulated in summaries completed during the after-action review.



Tip

This tool is closely aligned with the Project Charter Template; its sections mirror the structure of the Project Charter Template. However, it can also be used as a standalone tool in place of a full charter, such as when retrofitting an ongoing initiative into a newly implemented knowledge structuring routine.

Related

Next steps

  • Institutions evolve over time, and understanding past initiatives helps shape future goals. Use this tool to map your journey and spark discussions about your direction: Transformation Timeline.

Intended vs. Actual Outcomes

Why is this tool important?

This results-oriented reflection promotes accountability, supports continuous improvement, and ensures that projects deliver meaningful results. It helps assess the effectiveness of an initiative, identify gaps, and inform future planning. By understanding where expectations aligned or diverged from reality, institutions can make more informed decisions, improve strategies, and better demonstrate the value of their initiatives to stakeholders.

Guide

If there is a difference in intended vs. actual outcomes, describe what you think happened. For each Intended outcome, consider the following factors that might have impacted the change in outcome:  

  • Project scope
  • Project approach
  • Timeline

  • Budget
  • Milestones
  • Key stakeholders

  • Sustainability plan
  • Resources



Tip

Projects are dynamic and often evolve throughout their lifespan. By reflecting on the differences between intended and actual outcomes, including both successes and challenges, you can gain valuable insights for future planning. This reflection helps refine future initiatives regarding anticipated changes like budgeting and timing, feedback loops, stakeholder involvement, and communication needs.


Project Title

Intended Outcome

Actual outcome

What factor(s) impacted the
change in outcome?

 Describe what changed



Select



Project Scope



Project Approach



Timeline



Budget



Milestones



Key stakeholders



Sustainability Plan



Resources



Other

Findings & Recommendations

Why is this tool important?

It helps you synthesize insights from an initiative by addressing critical guiding questions related to achievements, challenges, outcomes, and future steps. This tool ensures that all aspects of the project, including measurable impacts, stakeholder relationships, and areas for improvement, are systematically reviewed.



Tip

When determining the level of detail in your analysis, consider how your insights could benefit colleagues on different initiatives. Even if their focus differs, they can still gain valuable guidance from the lessons and strategies you’ve identified.


Guiding Questions

  1. What were the key achievements and milestones of the initiative?

Measurability

Can you pull out any critical impact data? Leading indicators? 

Relationships

How did any key relationships or stakeholders make a difference in the success of the initiative?

 

  1. What were the key challenges and barriers you faced throughout the initiative?

Outcomes

Where did you fall short in terms of outcomes? Include any representative data.

Relationships

Did any key relationships/ stakeholders create challenges?

Were there missed opportunities for success?

  1. What feedback have you gathered from students on the impact 
of the project?

  1. Any open questions and/or areas for expanded partnership 
or research?

  1. Can this be scaled?

Reasons

Why or why not? 

Future

What are key steps for scaling 
or replicability?

  1. Any AHA! Moments — moments of revelation or things you wished you knew before starting?

Adjustments

What do you need to change? 
Are there any implications/risks in doing so?

Engagement

Are there any ways to further engage key stakeholders in the next iteration of the work/advancing the work?

  1. How would you recommend the institution move forward based on the outcome(s) of this project?

If you used the Project Charter Template and created a Sustainability Plan, revisit that and
update as needed.


Project Title

  1. Successes

Answer

  1. Challenges

Answer

  1. Feedback from students

Answer

  1. Open questions

Answer

  1. Is this project scalable?

Yes

or

No

Reasons

Answer

Future

Answer

  1. Lessons Learned

Answer

  1. Recommendations

Answer

Project Closeout Checklist

Why is this tool important?

Stakeholder communication is essential at the close of an initiative and for the persistence of its impact and afterlife. Use this checklist to ensure that everyone who needed to review the initiative’s deliverables has done so and that those who need to be kept in the loop are informed of the initiative’s findings and completion.

Project Title

  1. Stakeholder review

List of individuals to review and/or share-out

Has the initiative been reviewed by them?

Name

Department

Yes

or

No


Name

Department

Yes

or

No


Name

Department

Yes

or

No

  1. Information management

Has all documentation been compiled?

Yes

or

No

Document name

Where does this
document live long-term?

Insert link, such as library,
server etc.

Able to share outside
the initiative?

Insert link, such as library,
server etc.

Keywords

For repository of initiatives



Tip

Even the most thorough project documentation is ineffective if it’s buried in a disorganized folder structure or saved on personalized drives. Take time with your team to develop and routinize a systematic approach to storing your initiative inventory in an accessible location.

One Page Executive Summary

Why is this tool important?

The one-page executive summary is meant to provide a quick overview of the project that can be easily shared and understood by stakeholders. This tool can be utilized in at least three different ways throughout the initiative lifecycle

If created during an initiative in place of a full charter, the one-page executive summary helps gather the most relevant details of the initiative, such as the title, goals, and key contacts. This allows you to start building an inventory of ongoing initiatives, ensuring that critical information is documented early on.

When developed during the after-action review process at the end of the initiative, the one-page executive summary serves as a culmination of the insights gained from all other activities and guides in the After Action Review. By following the steps outlined in the toolkit, you will be able to complete the summary with a comprehensive reflection of the project

Before launching new initiatives, it’s essential to review the inventory of past projects and research similar work that has been done (see Research Overview). Utilizing these summaries as a recourse for learning allows you to reflect on previous successes and challenges, helping to inform and shape the approach of new projects.



Tip

Take the time to discuss each section of the executive summary, especially when addressing project failures. Honest reflection on mistakes is key to learning and improving. To foster this environment, incentivize team members to openly discuss errors rather than hide them.



Activity



Tip

Be deliberate about how executive summaries become part of the institutional knowledge base, incorporating their review into the standard practices for launching new initiatives.

There may be overlap with content from the Project Charter Template, which can be partially copy-pasted into this template.


Project Title

  1. Purpose statement

Answer

  1. Project Outcomes

Answer

  1. Key successes

Answer

  1. Key findings & recommendations

Answer

  1. Disaggregated student success impact

Answer

  1. Is this project scalable?

Yes

or

No

Reasons

Answer

  1. Team contact information

Name

Role

Email

Other

  1. How to get full report/documentation

Answer

  1. Keywords (for repository of initiatives)

Answer



Tip

To avoid random tagging, establish a ‘dictionary’ of keywords or ‘rules of engagement.’ For example, require at least five key tags per initiative, covering areas such as initative target group, stakeholders, impact measurement/data categories (e.g., enrollment, retention, reputation), and relevant departments or institutions